<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Tip: Take the time to read ingredients labels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foodembrace.com/2009/02/tuesday-tip-take-the-time-to-read-ingredients-labels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foodembrace.com/2009/02/tuesday-tip-take-the-time-to-read-ingredients-labels/</link>
	<description>Embrace Food, Embrace Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:06:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://foodembrace.com/2009/02/tuesday-tip-take-the-time-to-read-ingredients-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodembrace.com/?p=3797#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>Definitely agreed. The less ingredients the better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely agreed. The less ingredients the better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.J.</title>
		<link>http://foodembrace.com/2009/02/tuesday-tip-take-the-time-to-read-ingredients-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>T.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodembrace.com/?p=3797#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>And another p.s.

I found this:  http://www.fda.gov/opacom/laws/fplact.htm  which I think is the thing we&#039;re looking for, and it went into effect in 1967.....

T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And another p.s.</p>
<p>I found this:  <a href="http://www.fda.gov/opacom/laws/fplact.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fda.gov/opacom/laws/fplact.htm</a>  which I think is the thing we&#8217;re looking for, and it went into effect in 1967&#8230;..</p>
<p>T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.J.</title>
		<link>http://foodembrace.com/2009/02/tuesday-tip-take-the-time-to-read-ingredients-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>T.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodembrace.com/?p=3797#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>I remember my mom telling me about it when it started, but I don&#039;t remember exactly when.  Given the memory I have of it, I&#039;m going to guess sometime in the 70&#039;s.

Don&#039;t hold me to that tho, as my Google-Fu is not strong this morning either.....

T.

ps if i can remember to take them to work i&#039;ll send your bowls out today!!!  t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember my mom telling me about it when it started, but I don&#8217;t remember exactly when.  Given the memory I have of it, I&#8217;m going to guess sometime in the 70&#8242;s.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t hold me to that tho, as my Google-Fu is not strong this morning either&#8230;..</p>
<p>T.</p>
<p>ps if i can remember to take them to work i&#8217;ll send your bowls out today!!!  t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: special k</title>
		<link>http://foodembrace.com/2009/02/tuesday-tip-take-the-time-to-read-ingredients-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator>special k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodembrace.com/?p=3797#comment-1521</guid>
		<description>I honestly don&#039;t remember a time when food labels didn&#039;t exist in Canada, and I&#039;m kinda old, so they&#039;ve definitely been around awhile.  Are they really so recent development (relatively speaking) in the U.S.  I find that astonishing, given that cosmetics in the U.S. are required to have ingredients labels (and yet?  Not so much in Canada).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly don&#8217;t remember a time when food labels didn&#8217;t exist in Canada, and I&#8217;m kinda old, so they&#8217;ve definitely been around awhile.  Are they really so recent development (relatively speaking) in the U.S.  I find that astonishing, given that cosmetics in the U.S. are required to have ingredients labels (and yet?  Not so much in Canada).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://foodembrace.com/2009/02/tuesday-tip-take-the-time-to-read-ingredients-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodembrace.com/?p=3797#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>i am frequently amazed at &quot;health&quot; products that have some awful ingredients! it&#039;s a lesson learned through lots of label reading</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am frequently amazed at &#8220;health&#8221; products that have some awful ingredients! it&#8217;s a lesson learned through lots of label reading</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://foodembrace.com/2009/02/tuesday-tip-take-the-time-to-read-ingredients-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodembrace.com/?p=3797#comment-1518</guid>
		<description>Great tip for us all to keep in mind. I used to read labels constantly - now, not so much. I should get back in the habit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tip for us all to keep in mind. I used to read labels constantly &#8211; now, not so much. I should get back in the habit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camtim42</title>
		<link>http://foodembrace.com/2009/02/tuesday-tip-take-the-time-to-read-ingredients-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Camtim42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodembrace.com/?p=3797#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>Good post!  I&#039;ve been so surprised by some of the things I&#039;ve read on the ingredients list!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post!  I&#8217;ve been so surprised by some of the things I&#8217;ve read on the ingredients list!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://foodembrace.com/2009/02/tuesday-tip-take-the-time-to-read-ingredients-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodembrace.com/?p=3797#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>...and don&#039;t necessarily trust the labels on packaging.  The last loaf of 100% whole wheat bread I bought touts no HFCS, which is true enough (and no sugar was used at all that I can see), but then at the end it lists soy flour and says it contains a &#039;trivial amount.&#039;  To me that means that it isn&#039;t 100% whole wheat, but maybe I&#039;m quibbling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and don&#8217;t necessarily trust the labels on packaging.  The last loaf of 100% whole wheat bread I bought touts no HFCS, which is true enough (and no sugar was used at all that I can see), but then at the end it lists soy flour and says it contains a &#8216;trivial amount.&#8217;  To me that means that it isn&#8217;t 100% whole wheat, but maybe I&#8217;m quibbling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caitlin</title>
		<link>http://foodembrace.com/2009/02/tuesday-tip-take-the-time-to-read-ingredients-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodembrace.com/?p=3797#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>i know what you mean! fiber 1 has artifical sweetener in it (who  knew). its disappointing because it otherwise has a great nutritional profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know what you mean! fiber 1 has artifical sweetener in it (who  knew). its disappointing because it otherwise has a great nutritional profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 19/34 queries in 0.019 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 352/357 objects using disk: basic

Served from: foodembrace.com @ 2012-02-12 09:54:59 -->
